2004 biophysical society discussions program

Probing Membrane Microdomains
October 28-31, Asilomar, California


Ken Jacobson, Organizer

Friday, October 29, 2004
9:00 am
Introduction

Introductory Remarks
Ken Jacobson, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

9:15 am–12:00 noon
Session I. Recent Concepts in Membrane Heterogeneity
Chair: Michael Edidin, Johns Hopkins University

 

Issues:

  1. How much does molecular and vesicular traffic to and from the surface contribute to the formation and dispersion of lipid domains? Are the domains formed in model membranes any guide to domain formation and dispersion in native membranes?

  2. How effectively can we use model membrane data to infer organization of cell membranes?

  3. Are we missing/ignorant of proteins that organize membrane lipids? The caveolin-1 knockout mouse can be interpreted as showing redundancy of caveolin function?

  4.  Who organizes whom in signaling? Do ligated receptors partition into preexisting rafts or do they organize non-annular lipids into a raft?

    Unsolved Questions about caveolae and Lipid Rafts
    Dick Anderson, UTHSC, Dallas

    Respondent (Role of respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)

    Tobias Baumgart

    Regulation of the Spatial Organization of Signal-transducing Receptors within the Plasma Membrane of B Lymphocytes 
    Sue Pierce, NIH

    Respondent (Role of respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)

    Francisco Barrantes

    Nanoclusters
    Satyajit Mayor, National Center for Biological Sciences, Bangalore

    Respondent (Role of respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)

    Samuel Hess

    Single Molecule Imaging of Raft Dynamics and Raft-based Signal Transduction in Living Cells
    Aki Kusumi, Nagoya University

    Respondent (Role of respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)

    Christoph Naumann

    Membrane Domains and Lipid Traffic
    Fred Maxfield, Cornell Medical College

    Break

    General Discussion

 

12:00 Noon

Lunch

 

 

1:10 pm–2:00 pm

Exhibitor Talk

Recent Advances in Atomic Force Microscopy for Membrane Research Applications

Irene Revenko, Asylum Research

 

 

2:15 pm–3:00 pm

Exhibitor Talk

New Tools for Biophotonics

Angela Goodacre, Olympus America

 

3:00 pm–5:00 pm
Poster Session I
Posters 1-51 will be presented 

 

7:00 pm–10:00 pm
Session II. How Can the Lessons from Model Membranes be Applied to Cell Membranes?
Chair: John Silvius, McGill University

 

Part I.

Focus Questions for Presenters: What are the Origins, Properties and Thermodynamics of Liquid-ordered Domains?

    Chemical Activity of Cholesterol in Membranes
    Harden McConnell, Stanford University

    How Can the Lessons from Model Membranes be Applied to Cell Membranes
    Gerry Feigenson, Cornell University

    Kinetics of the Association of Amphiphiles with Lipid Bilayers as a Probe of Membrane Physical State
    Winchil Vaz, University of Coimbra, Portugal

    Open Discussion

Application’ question I:

Model-system workers have trashed differential detergent solubilization and cyclodextrin treatments as viable approaches to study rafts in cells. Now what GOOD news can we offer cell biologists about tools and approaches they can apply to study ‘rafts’ in their systems?

 

Part II.

Focus question II:

What systems and conditions favor nanoscale as opposed to micron-scale domain formation, and what can we learn about the dynamics and other properties of nanodomains based on model-system work?

    Using Fluorescence Microscopy and NMR to Identify Immiscible Liquid Phases in Vesicles
    Sarah Keller, University of Washington
    Understanding the Role of Lipid Structure in Raft Formation by use of Novel Fluorescence Approaches for Detecting Nanoscale Lipid Domains
    Erwin London, SUNY, Stony Brook

    Respondent (Role of respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)

    Ivan Polozov

    Open Discussion

    Break

Application’ question II:

What have we learned/can we learn from model-system studies to help us to understand the nature of ‘rafts’ in the cytoplasmic membrane leaflet (re: interleaflet coupling,

 

 

Part III.

Focus question III:

How do membrane proteins respond to and modify the phase/domain organization of model lipid ‘raft’-forming systems?

Role of Bilayer Structural/Elastic Properties in THE Sorting of Transbilayer Peptides Between Detergent Soluble Bilayers and Detergent Resistant Rafts
Tom McIntosh, Duke University

    Respondents (Role of respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)

    Richard Epand

    Robert Henderson

General Discussion of this Question

Application’ question III:

Can lipid systems model biological-membrane ‘raft’ phenomena even qualitatively if they don’t contain high densities of integral proteins?

 

Saturday October 30, 2004
9 am–12:00 noon
Session III. Microscopy and Novel Biological Functions of Membrane Domains
Chair: Barbara Baird, Cornell University

 

Issues:

Overview: Microscopy with selective probes has been a central approach to investigating organization and dynamics of plasma membranes. However, images or measurements can be limited by sample or probe preparations, and any single type of measurement provides limited information. For example, diffraction limits optical microscopy in  examining molecular interactions such as they occur to create function in membrane microdomains. Targeted biological reagents (e.g., viral proteins, toxins) or engineered environments (e.g. nanofabrication) provide some advantages. In describing standard and emerging approaches, the speakers will frame and address specific questions about microdomains in living cells and focus on the following issues:

  1. What  fundamental new information has a particular approach provided so far about membrane microdomains  on living cells

  2. What are the unique capabilities and what are the major limitations of this approach?What should be our highest expectations for a particular approach - in strategic combination with other selected approaches -- to provide a detailed understanding of membrane microdomains on living cells?

  3. Each respondent will address the same issues with respect to specific points made by the preceding speakers

    Introduction

    Barbara Baird, Cornell University

     

    FRAP Approaches to Studying Lipid Rafts
    Anne Kenworthy, Vanderbilt University

    Strengths and Weaknesses of Single-Molecule Tracking
    Marija Vrljic, Stanford University

    Strengths and Limitations of FCS as Applied to Microdomains
    Petra Schwille, University of Dresden of Technology

    Respondents (Role of respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)

    Antoine Triller

    Erin Sheets

    Tione Buranda

    Discussion 1

    Break

    Probing Membrane Microdomains with Atomic Force and Near-field Scanning Optical Microscopy
    Linda Johnston, National Research Council, Ottawa

    Respondent (Role of respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)

    Marjolein Koopman

    What Undesired Foreigners Tell us about Lipid Rafts and Membrane Domains
    Gisou Van der Goot, University of Geneva

    Strategies for Studying the Size, Structure, and Function of Rafts in Cells
    Josh Zimmerberg, NIH

     

    Discussion 2

12:00 Noon

Lunch

 

 

2:15 pm–3:00 pm

Exhibitor Talk

George Peters & Mike Buchin, Solamer Technology Group and Stanford Photonics

 

 

3:00 pm–5:00 pm
Poster Session II  
Posters 52-103 will be presented.

7:00 pm–10:00 pm
Session IV. Inner Leaflet and Membrane Associated Cytoskeleton
Chair: Kai Simons, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics

 

Issues:

  1. How and when does the outer leaflet couple with the inner leaflet in raft microdomains in cell membranes?

  2. What do we know about the binding of proteins to the inner leaflet of cell membranes and does this information give us insight into membrane domain organization?

  3. What do we know about the organization of the underlying actin cytoskeleton with respect to lateral mobility of bilayer constituents?

    Exploring Membrane Microdomain Organization by Electron Microscopy
    Jan Oliver, University of New Mexico

    Ras Plasma Membrane Signaling Platforms
    John Hancock, University of Queensland

    Respondent (Role of respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)

    Claus Helix Nielsen

    Too Many Proteins at the Membrane Looking for Lipids
    Mike Sheetz, Columbia University

    How Clusters of Basic/Hydrophobic Residues on Proteins Interact with Lipids in Membranes
    Stuart McLaughlin, SUNY, Stony Brook

    Plasma Membrane/Endoplasmic Reticulum Junctions and Sub-plasmalemmal Spaces
    Mordecai Blaustein, University of Maryland

Break

 

General Discussion


Sunday, October 31, 2004
7:30 am–10:30 am
Session V. Emerging Physical and Computational Techniques
Chairs: Michael Saxton, University of California, Davis
            Nancy Thompson, University of North Carolina

 

Issues:

  1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different emerging experimental methods (FCS, FLIM, X-ray, Neutron, etc.)?  How do these techniques compare in terms of

    (a) applicability to live/fixed cells and/or model membranes,

    (b) possible artifacts coming from sample preparation,

    (c) spatial resolution

    (d) temporal resolution

    (e) sensitivity? 

     

    • How can measurements be designed so that the results of these different methods are most easily compared in a fruitful fashion? 

    • How do these methods compare in their abilities to definitely address key raft questions raised during the previous talks of the conference?

     

  2. How can we better connect computational studies with experiment?

    "Modeling a raft" is nice but the work would be far more useful if it focused on specific existing hypotheses of raft structure: 

    • Lipid-cholesterol complexes

    • Sheltering of cholesterol from water

    • Selectivity for certain membrane proteins

    • The Lo-Ld interface and localization of certain species there

     

    More generally, how can we get closer linkage between simulation and experiment in order to generate and test hypotheses?

     

    Introduction

    Michael Saxton, University of California, Davis
    Nancy Thompson, University of North Carolina

     

    Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy Techniques
    Enrico Gratton, UIUC

  • Specific questions for speaker, talk #1

The use of Single Domain Llama Antibodies in FLIM
Paul van Bergen en Henegouwen, University of Utrecht

  • Specific questions for speaker, talk #2

Spatio-Temporal Imaging of Signal Transduction Processes in Single Cells
Banafshe Larijani, London Research Institute

  • Specific questions for speaker, talk #3

Could Diffuse Scattering of X-Rays and/or Neutrons Provide Structural Information about Rafts?
John Nagle, CMU

  • Specific questions for speaker, talk #4

Modeling Mixed Lipid Bilayers: Atomic and Ginzburg-Landau Simulations
Larry Scott, Illinois Institute of Technology

  • Specific questions for speaker, talk #5

A Plead for ζ
Ole Mouritsen, Odense, Denmark

  • Specific questions for speaker, talk #6

Break

 

Respondents (Role of respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)

Paul Wiseman

Roland Winte

Martin Zuckermann

Scott Feller

General Discussion

Meeting ends

 


The Biophysical Society 2004 Discussions were supported in part by the following sponsors:

Asylum Research

Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc.

Bruker Biospin

Carl Zeiss Werk Gottingen 

Chroma Technology

The Cooke Corporation

Hamamatsu Photonic Systems

ISS Corporation

Leica Microsystems USA

Molecular Probes

National Institutes of Health (NIH)
     National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
     National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney Disorders (NIDDK)
     National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Nikon Inc.

Olympus America

Omega Optical, Inc. 

Rigaku Corporation

Solamere Technology Group
Stanford Photonics
Universal Imaging


Biophysical Society - 9650 Rockville Pike - Bethesda, Maryland 20814   Phone: 301.634.7114    Fax: 301.634.7133    society@biophysics.org