  |
2004
biophysical society discussions program
Probing Membrane
Microdomains
October 28-31, Asilomar, California
Ken Jacobson, Organizer
Friday, October 29, 2004
9:00 am
Introduction
Introductory Remarks
Ken Jacobson, University of
North Carolina, Chapel Hill
9:15 am–12:00 noon
Session
I. Recent Concepts in Membrane Heterogeneity
Chair: Michael Edidin, Johns
Hopkins University
Issues:
-
How much
does molecular and vesicular traffic to and from the surface contribute to
the formation and dispersion of lipid domains? Are the domains formed in
model membranes any guide to domain formation and dispersion in native
membranes?
-
How
effectively can we use model membrane data to infer organization of cell
membranes?
-
Are we
missing/ignorant of proteins that organize membrane lipids? The caveolin-1
knockout mouse can be interpreted as showing redundancy of caveolin
function?
-
Who
organizes whom in signaling? Do ligated receptors partition into preexisting
rafts or do they organize non-annular lipids into a raft?
Unsolved
Questions about caveolae and Lipid Rafts
Dick Anderson, UTHSC, Dallas
Respondent (Role of
respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)
Tobias Baumgart
Regulation
of the Spatial Organization of Signal-transducing Receptors within the
Plasma Membrane of B Lymphocytes
Sue Pierce, NIH
Respondent (Role of
respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)
Francisco Barrantes
Nanoclusters
Satyajit Mayor, National Center
for Biological Sciences, Bangalore
Respondent (Role of
respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)
Samuel Hess
Single
Molecule Imaging of Raft Dynamics and Raft-based Signal Transduction in
Living Cells
Aki Kusumi, Nagoya University
Respondent (Role of
respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work) Christoph Naumann
Membrane
Domains and Lipid Traffic
Fred Maxfield, Cornell Medical
College Break General Discussion
12: 00
Noon
Lunch
1:10 pm–2:00 pm
Exhibitor Talk
Recent Advances in Atomic Force
Microscopy for Membrane Research Applications
Irene Revenko, Asylum Research
2:15 pm–3:00 pm
Exhibitor Talk
New Tools for Biophotonics
Angela Goodacre, Olympus America
3:00 pm–5:00 pm
Poster
Session I Posters 1-51 will be presented
7:00 pm–10:00 pm
Session II. How Can the Lessons
from Model Membranes be Applied to Cell Membranes?
Chair: John Silvius, McGill
University
Part I. Focus Questions for
Presenters: What are the Origins, Properties and Thermodynamics of
Liquid-ordered Domains?
Chemical
Activity of Cholesterol in Membranes
Harden McConnell, Stanford
University
How
Can the Lessons from Model Membranes be Applied to Cell Membranes
Gerry Feigenson, Cornell University
Kinetics
of the Association of Amphiphiles with Lipid Bilayers as a Probe of Membrane
Physical State
Winchil Vaz, University of Coimbra, Portugal
Open Discussion
Application’ question I:
Model-system workers have
trashed differential detergent solubilization and cyclodextrin treatments as
viable approaches to study rafts in cells. Now what GOOD news can we offer cell
biologists about tools and approaches they can apply to study ‘rafts’ in their
systems?
Part II.
Focus question II:
What systems and conditions
favor nanoscale as opposed to micron-scale domain formation, and what can we
learn about the dynamics and other properties of nanodomains based on
model-system work?
Using
Fluorescence Microscopy and NMR to Identify Immiscible Liquid Phases in
Vesicles
Sarah Keller, University of
Washington
Understanding
the Role of Lipid Structure in Raft Formation by use of Novel Fluorescence
Approaches for Detecting Nanoscale Lipid Domains
Erwin London, SUNY, Stony
Brook
Respondent (Role of
respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)
Ivan
Polozov
Open Discussion
Break
Application’ question II:
What have we learned/can we
learn from model-system studies to help us to understand the nature of ‘rafts’
in the cytoplasmic membrane leaflet (re: interleaflet coupling,
Part III.
Focus question
III:
How do membrane
proteins respond to and modify the phase/domain organization of model lipid
‘raft’-forming systems?
Role
of Bilayer Structural/Elastic Properties in THE Sorting of Transbilayer
Peptides Between Detergent Soluble Bilayers and Detergent Resistant Rafts
Tom McIntosh, Duke University
General Discussion of this
Question
Application’ question III:
Can lipid systems model
biological-membrane ‘raft’ phenomena even qualitatively if they don’t contain
high densities of integral proteins?
Saturday October 30,
2004
9 am–12:00 noon
Session III. Microscopy and
Novel Biological Functions of Membrane Domains
Chair: Barbara Baird, Cornell
University
Issues:
Overview: Microscopy with
selective probes has been a central approach to investigating organization and
dynamics of plasma membranes. However, images or measurements can be limited by
sample or probe preparations, and any single type of measurement provides
limited information. For example, diffraction limits optical microscopy in
examining molecular interactions such as they occur to create function in
membrane microdomains. Targeted biological reagents (e.g., viral proteins,
toxins) or engineered environments (e.g. nanofabrication) provide some
advantages. In describing standard and emerging approaches, the speakers will
frame and address specific questions about microdomains in living cells and
focus on the following issues:
-
What fundamental new
information has a particular approach provided so far about membrane
microdomains on living cells
-
What are the unique
capabilities and what are the major limitations of this approach?What should
be our highest expectations for a particular approach - in strategic
combination with other selected approaches -- to provide a detailed
understanding of membrane microdomains on living cells?
-
Each respondent will
address the same issues with respect to specific points made by the
preceding speakers
Introduction
Barbara Baird, Cornell University
FRAP
Approaches to Studying Lipid Rafts
Anne Kenworthy, Vanderbilt
University
Strengths
and Weaknesses of Single-Molecule Tracking
Marija Vrljic, Stanford University
Strengths
and Limitations of FCS as Applied to Microdomains
Petra Schwille, University
of Dresden of Technology
Respondents (Role of
respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)
Antoine Triller
Erin Sheets
Tione Buranda
Discussion
1 Break
Probing
Membrane Microdomains with Atomic Force and Near-field Scanning Optical
Microscopy
Linda Johnston, National Research
Council, Ottawa
Respondent (Role of
respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)
Marjolein Koopman
What
Undesired Foreigners Tell us about Lipid Rafts and Membrane Domains
Gisou Van der Goot, University
of Geneva
Strategies
for Studying the Size, Structure, and Function of Rafts in Cells
Josh Zimmerberg, NIH
Discussion 2
12: 00
Noon
Lunch
2:15 pm–3:00 pm
Exhibitor Talk
George Peters & Mike Buchin,
Solamer Technology Group and Stanford Photonics
3:00 pm–5:00 pm
Poster
Session II Posters 52-103 will be presented.
7:00 pm–10:00 pm
Session IV. Inner Leaflet
and Membrane Associated Cytoskeleton
Chair: Kai Simons, Max Planck
Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics
Issues:
-
How and when does the outer
leaflet couple with the inner leaflet in raft microdomains in cell
membranes?
-
What do we know about the
binding of proteins to the inner leaflet of cell membranes and does this
information give us insight into membrane domain organization?
-
What do we know about the
organization of the underlying actin cytoskeleton with respect to lateral
mobility of bilayer constituents?
Exploring
Membrane Microdomain Organization by Electron Microscopy
Jan Oliver, University of
New Mexico
Ras
Plasma Membrane Signaling Platforms
John Hancock, University of
Queensland
Respondent (Role of
respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)
Claus Helix Nielsen
Too
Many Proteins at the Membrane Looking for Lipids
Mike Sheetz, Columbia University
How
Clusters of Basic/Hydrophobic Residues on Proteins Interact with Lipids
in Membranes
Stuart McLaughlin, SUNY, Stony
Brook
Plasma
Membrane/Endoplasmic Reticulum Junctions and Sub-plasmalemmal Spaces
Mordecai Blaustein, University
of Maryland
Break
General Discussion
Sunday, October 31,
2004
7:30 am–10:30 am
Session V. Emerging Physical
and Computational Techniques
Chairs: Michael Saxton, University
of California, Davis
Nancy Thompson, University of North Carolina
Issues:
-
What are the advantages
and disadvantages of the different emerging experimental methods (FCS, FLIM,
X-ray, Neutron, etc.)? How do these techniques compare in terms of
(a) applicability to
live/fixed cells and/or model membranes,
(b) possible
artifacts coming from sample preparation,
(c) spatial
resolution
(d) temporal
resolution
(e) sensitivity?
-
How can measurements be
designed so that the results of these different methods are most easily
compared in a fruitful fashion?
-
How do these methods
compare in their abilities to definitely address key raft questions raised
during the previous talks of the conference?
-
How can we better
connect computational studies with experiment?
"Modeling a raft" is
nice but the work would be far more useful if it focused on specific
existing hypotheses of raft structure:
-
Lipid-cholesterol
complexes
-
Sheltering of
cholesterol from water
-
Selectivity for certain
membrane proteins
-
The Lo-Ld interface and
localization of certain species there
More generally, how can we
get closer linkage between simulation and experiment in order to
generate and test hypotheses?
Introduction
Michael Saxton, University of California, Davis
Nancy Thompson, University of North Carolina
Fluorescence
Correlation Spectroscopy Techniques
Enrico Gratton, UIUC
Specific questions for speaker, talk #1
The use of Single Domain Llama Antibodies in FLIM
Paul van Bergen en Henegouwen,
University of Utrecht
- Specific questions for speaker, talk #2
Spatio-Temporal
Imaging of Signal Transduction Processes in Single Cells
Banafshe Larijani, London
Research Institute
- Specific questions for speaker, talk #3
Could
Diffuse Scattering of X-Rays and/or Neutrons Provide Structural Information
about Rafts?
John Nagle, CMU
- Specific questions for speaker, talk #4
Modeling
Mixed Lipid Bilayers: Atomic and Ginzburg-Landau Simulations
Larry Scott, Illinois
Institute of Technology
- Specific questions for speaker, talk #5
A
Plead for ζ
Ole Mouritsen, Odense,
Denmark
- Specific questions for speaker, talk #6
Break
Respondents (Role of
respondent is to discuss/comment on the speaker's work)
Paul Wiseman
Roland Winte
Martin Zuckermann
Scott Feller
General Discussion
Meeting ends
The Biophysical Society 2004 Discussions were supported in part by the following
sponsors:
Asylum Research
Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc.
Bruker Biospin
Carl Zeiss Werk
Gottingen
Chroma Technology
The Cooke Corporation
Hamamatsu Photonic Systems
ISS Corporation
Leica Microsystems
USA
Molecular Probes
National
Institutes of Health (NIH)
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney
Disorders (NIDDK)
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Nikon Inc.
Olympus America
Omega Optical, Inc.
Rigaku Corporation
Solamere Technology Group Stanford Photonics
Universal Imaging
|